Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), including those with stent failure (restenosis or stent thrombosis)
Intracoronary imaging guidance using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) prior to and post-implantation during PCI
This EAPCI expert consensus document provides standardized recommendations and cut-offs for the clinical use of IVUS and OCT to guide, optimize, and troubleshoot percutaneous coronary interventions.
This Consensus Document is the first of two reports summarizing the views of an expert panel organized by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) on the clinical use of intracoronary imaging including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The first document appraises the role of intracoronary imaging to guide percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in clinical practice. Current evidence regarding the impact of intracoronary imaging guidance on cardiovascular outcomes is summarized, and patients or lesions most likely to derive clinical benefit from an imaging-guided intervention are identified. The relevance of the use of IVUS or OCT prior to PCI for optimizing stent sizing (stent length and diameter) and planning the procedural strategy is discussed. Regarding post-implantation imaging, the consensus group recommends key parameters that characterize an optimal PCI result and provides cut-offs to guide corrective measures and optimize the stenting result. Moreover, routine performance of intracoronary imaging in patients with stent failure (restenosis or stent thrombosis) is recommended. Finally, strengths and limitations of IVUS and OCT for guiding PCI and assessing stent failures and areas that warrant further research are critically discussed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lorenz Räber
Gary S. Mintz
Konstantinos C. Koskinas
EuroIntervention
Technical University of Munich
Rigshospitalet
University Hospital of Zurich
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Räber et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56e1375589c71d767d35d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/eijy18m06_01