Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Refugees and asylum seekers often have increased mental health needs, yet may face barriers in accessing mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) services in destination countries. The aim of this systematic review is to examine evidence on MHPSS service utilisation and access among refugees and asylum seekers in European Union Single Market countries. METHODS: Four peer-reviewed and eight grey literature databases were searched for quantitative and qualitative literature from 2007 to 2017. Access was categorised according to Penchansky and Thomas' framework and descriptive analyses were conducted. Quality of studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles were included. The findings suggest inadequate MHPSS utilisation. Major barriers to accessing care included language, help-seeking behaviours, lack of awareness, stigma, and negative attitudes towards and by providers. CONCLUSIONS: Refugees and asylum seekers have high mental health needs but under-utilise services in European host countries. This underutilisation may be explained by cultural-specific barriers which need to be tackled to increase treatment demand. Training health providers on cultural models of mental illness may facilitate appropriate identification, referral, and care. Based on these findings, it is crucial to review policies regarding MHPSS provision across the EU.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Emily N. Satinsky
Daniela C. Fuhr
Aniek Woodward
Health Policy
Cornell University
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Faculty of Public Health
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Satinsky et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0b7b83f380e2b59dca215b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.02.007
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: