Sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly reduce the rate of heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death (RR 0.87, P=0.06) versus valsartan in patients with HFpEF.
Does sacubitril-valsartan reduce total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes in patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction of 45% or higher?
patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction of 45% or higher
Sacubitril-valsartan
total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causescomposite
Sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly reduce the composite of heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death in patients with HFpEF (LVEF ≥45%).
BACKGROUND: The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril-valsartan led to a reduced risk of hospitalization for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The effect of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned 4822 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV heart failure, ejection fraction of 45% or higher, elevated level of natriuretic peptides, and structural heart disease to receive sacubitril-valsartan (target dose, 97 mg of sacubitril with 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or valsartan (target dose, 160 mg twice daily). The primary outcome was a composite of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes. Primary outcome components, secondary outcomes (including NYHA class change, worsening renal function, and change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire KCCQ clinical summary score scale, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and physical limitations), and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: There were 894 primary events in 526 patients in the sacubitril-valsartan group and 1009 primary events in 557 patients in the valsartan group (rate ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.75 to 1.01; P = 0.06). The incidence of death from cardiovascular causes was 8.5% in the sacubitril-valsartan group and 8.9% in the valsartan group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.16); there were 690 and 797 total hospitalizations for heart failure, respectively (rate ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.00). NYHA class improved in 15.0% of the patients in the sacubitril-valsartan group and in 12.6% of those in the valsartan group (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.86); renal function worsened in 1.4% and 2.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.77). The mean change in the KCCQ clinical summary score at 8 months was 1.0 point (95% CI, 0.0 to 2.1) higher in the sacubitril-valsartan group. Patients in the sacubitril-valsartan group had a higher incidence of hypotension and angioedema and a lower incidence of hyperkalemia. Among 12 prespecified subgroups, there was suggestion of heterogeneity with possible benefit with sacubitril-valsartan in patients with lower ejection fraction and in women. CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril-valsartan did not result in a significantly lower rate of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes among patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction of 45% or higher. (Funded by Novartis; PARAGON-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01920711.).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Scott D. Solomon
John J.V. McMurray
Inder S. Anand
New England Journal of Medicine
Harvard University
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Inserm
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Solomon et al. (Sun,) reported a other. Sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly reduce the rate of heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death (RR 0.87, P=0.06) versus valsartan in patients with HFpEF.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6965117d7269e604acbf68f8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1908655