Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Hype, or simplified and sensationalised science, appears to be inescapable in science communication with examples extending from viral social media accounts and 'breakthrough'-themed press releases, to the mediated claims of the celebrity scientist. In science communication, the negative effects of hype are familiar. The question is whether hype is always a distortion and a lie, or can it be redeemed? This essay reviews the contribution of hype to science, specifically in terms of encouraging reflexivity for science and technology. I present three perspectives on hype and invite further conversation on the role of hype in science communication.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tara Roberson
Public Understanding of Science
The University of Queensland
Australian National University
ARC Centre of Excellence for Engineered Quantum Systems
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tara Roberson (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e81b2a25b240b7a3dfba — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520923109
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: