Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Many are calling for concrete mechanisms of oversight for health research involving artificial intelligence (AI). In response, institutional review boards (IRBs) are being turned to as a familiar model of governance. Here, we examine the IRB model as a form of ethics oversight for health research that uses AI. We consider the model's origins, analyze the challenges IRBs are facing in the contexts of both industry and academia, and offer concrete recommendations for how these committees might be adapted in order to provide an effective mechanism of oversight for health-related AI research.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Phoebe Friesen
Rachel Douglas‐Jones
Mason Marks
Ethics & Human Research
University of Oxford
University College London
McGill University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Friesen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07fd30f1d046f829735f5a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500085
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: