The Lazy Luna software enabled automatic multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification, demonstrating an average Dice similarity coefficient of 91.9% for all images between two expert readers.
Observational (n=13)
No
Cardiac function assessment (n=13)
Lazy Luna software vs Manual segmentation by expert readers
Average Dice similarity coefficient for all images
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for cardiac function assessment. Quantification of clinical results (CR) requires precise segmentation. Clinicians statistically compare CRs to ensure reproducibility. Convolutional Neural Network developers compare their results via metrics. Aim: Introducing software capable of automatic multilevel comparison. A multilevel analysis covering segmentations and CRs builds on a generic software backend. Metrics and CRs are calculated with geometric accuracy. Segmentations and CRs are connected to track errors and their effects. An interactive GUI makes the software accessible to different users. The software's multilevel comparison was tested on a use case based on cardiac function assessment. The software shows good reader agreement in CRs and segmentation metrics (Dice > 90%). Decomposing differences by cardiac position revealed excellent agreement in midventricular slices: > 90% but poorer segmentations in apical (> 71%) and basal slices (> 74%). Further decomposition by contour type locates the largest millilitre differences in the basal right cavity (> 3 ml). Visual inspection shows these differences being caused by different basal slice choices. The software illuminated reader differences on several levels. Producing spreadsheets and figures concerning metric values and CR differences was automated. A multilevel reader comparison is feasible and extendable to other cardiac structures in the future.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thomas Hadler
Max Delbrück Center
Jens Wetzl
Cardiac Imaging
Steffen Lange
Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences
Scientific Reports
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Freie Universität Berlin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hadler et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Cardiac function assessment (n=13). Lazy Luna software vs. Manual segmentation by expert readers was evaluated on Average Dice similarity coefficient for all images. The Lazy Luna software enabled automatic multilevel comparison of ventricular function quantification, demonstrating an average Dice similarity coefficient of 91.9% for all images between two expert readers.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16c6607cba52b0f77b9494 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10464-w