Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Injection of CO 2 to enhance oil recovery is widely used due to its multiple advantages such as mobilizing the oil and sequestration of carbon dioxide. Injection of CO 2 can enhance oil recovery by reducing oil viscosity and improving overall fluid mobility. However, several problems are associated with CO 2 injection such as viscous fingering, gravity override, and CO 2 channeling that results in early gas breakthrough, low sweep efficiency, and low ultimate oil recovery. In this study, dual benefits of CO 2 injection are presented: enhancing oil recovery and sequestering carbon dioxide. In this work, different scenarios of field scale simulation were conducted to evaluate oil recovery during CO 2 injection, and the CMG (Computer Modeling Group) software package was used. Three main scenarios were examined which are CO 2 injection into the reservoir, CO 2 injection into the aquifer, and CO 2 injection into the aquifer followed by waterflooding. Also, three well configurations were utilized—all injectors and producers are drilled vertically, all wells are drilled horizontally, and vertical injectors and horizontal producers are used. Therefore, the oil recovery profiles were examined for nine scenarios over a 20-year period. In all simulated models, CO 2 injection was started at the residual oil saturation (S or ) conditions, to represent the cases of depleted oil reservoirs. The results indicated that the highest oil recovery of 73% of the original oil-in-place (OOIP) can be achieved by injecting CO 2 into the reservoir, utilizing vertical injectors and producers. While injecting CO 2 into aquifers can significantly enhance oil recovery by around 68–70% of the OOIP, using horizontal wells can provide more oil recovery (67.7%) than that using vertical wells (54.8%), in the same conditions. Moreover, around 7,928 tons of carbon dioxide can be sequestered in underground formations, on average. Finally, CO 2 injection outperformed the conventional waterflooding, where 68 and 12% of the OOIP were obtained, respectively. Overall, injection of CO 2 into the depleted reservoir can provide dual benefits of CO 2 sequestration and improved oil recovery. CO 2 can be injected into the water zone resulting in a slow release of CO 2 which will reduce the fluid viscosity, enhance oil recovery, and reduce the greenhouse effect.
Alam et al. (Wed,) studied this question.