Vaginal Swab vs Urine for Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, andTrichomonas vaginalis:A Meta-Analysis

Aaron et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd264503ecda3005e52d78 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2942

Also consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1. Limitations of Screening Tests for the Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Asymptomatic Adolescent and Young Adult Women· 2004 · 5 citations
2. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement· 2021 · 2,784 citations
3. Comparison of APTIMA Trichomonas vaginalis transcription-mediated amplification to wet mount microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of trichomoniasis in men and women· 2009 · 268 citations
4. Evaluation of Self-Collected Samples in Contrast to Practitioner-Collected Samples for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis by Polymerase Chain Reaction Among Women Living in Remote Areas· 2002 · 129 citations
5. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement· 1999 · 4,817 citations