Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract An outsourcing decision does not equate to the outsourcing of a sourcing decision. Many indirect transactions with lower tier suppliers are embedded in transactions with first‐tier suppliers. Building on the identification of a transaction as the fundamental unit of analysis, this study proposes that transactions comprise bundles of intertwined direct transactions at the firm level and indirect transactions at the supply chain level. These indirect transactions require separate but not independent sourcing decisions. Using a buyer's decision to control or delegate the governance of indirect transactions for an externally sourced product, this study demonstrates that disaggregating the transaction advances theory by extending the range of outcomes, refining the calculus of the make‐or‐buy decision, and providing a coherent theoretical framework for multi‐tier supply chain management. This study considers the theoretical, managerial, and societal implications across various contingencies involving inter‐firm relationships.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sangho Chae
University of Warwick
Thomas Y. Choi
Arizona State University
Glenn Hoetker
The University of Melbourne
Journal of Supply Chain Management
The University of Melbourne
Arizona State University
University of Warwick
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chae et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e721f4b6db64358769b1bd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12318