Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Logical structures count as critical learning content for learning to prove. They are often not sufficiently explicated, and students struggle to use and articulate them in their proofs. In this design research study, we adopt a scaffolding approach to engage high school students in using and articulating logical structures. The qualitative analysis of the design experiments reveals the potentials and limitations of graphical scaffolds, showing how graphical scaffolds must and can be complemented by linguistic scaffolds to enable students to select and combine arguments in a deductive chain and write a proof text. Implications for language-responsive proof teaching and learning are discussed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hein et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6f15ab6db64358766ba7d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101123
Kerstin Hein
Susanne Prediger
The Journal of Mathematical Behavior
TU Dortmund University
Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: