Exponential Inequalities: Equality Law in Times of Crisis ed. by Shreya Atrey & Sandra Fredman (review)

Reviewed by: Exponential Inequalities: Equality Law in Times of Crisis ed. by Shreya Atrey Mark Bell; and Jessica Clark). Other doctrines have potential but are not used to their proper extent. Meghan Campbell shows that although the U.K. courts largely recognized the above mentioned restrictions on welfare measures as prima facie indirectly discriminatory, their scrutiny of them, especially at the proportionality stage, needed to be more probing. Victoria Miyandazi (for Kenya), Aparna Chandra (for India), and Catherine Albertyn (for South Africa) observe that there is scope for better use of their countries' constitutional equality provisions, especially when it comes of socio-economic rights' adjudication. Connectedly, and finally, based on the critical assessments, many authors provide normative proposals or suggest "good practice" to be followed. These go, firstly, for equality law itself. Several authors suggest "substantive equality" measures—beyond an individualized litigation model, often ex ante and...