Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Purpose In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), RAS mutation loss may occur during the standard-of-care regimen. In this study, we aimed to investigate the temporal dynamics of the RAS gene and its clinical significance. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study that included 82 patients with tissue RAS -mutant ( RAS -MT) mCRC who underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS monitoring between January, 2013–April, 2023. Patients were analyzed for the rate of change over time to acquired RAS mutation loss (a RAS -ML) and clinicopathological factors. The prognostic relevance of mutation loss was assessed. Results a RAS -ML was detected in 33 (40.2%) patients, 32 of whom had a mutation loss in the first ctDNA RAS assay. Patients with a RAS mutation detected in the first assay had a median time of 8 months until the second ctDNA RAS assay, with 4.5% cases newly converted to a RAS -ML; no new conversions were detected at the third assay. The a RAS -ML group exhibited more single-organ metastases in the target organ during ctDNA measurement (a RAS -ML: 84.8% vs. RAS -MT: 59.2%, p = 0.02). Of the 33 patients with a RAS -ML, seven (21.2%) received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy, with a median progression-free survival of 8 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that persistent ctDNA RAS mutation was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.1–6.3, p = 0.02). Conclusion The rate of ctDNA mutation loss in patients with RAS -MT mCRC decreases over time. Therefore, using a ctDNA RAS assay early in treatment will assist in challenging the use of EGFR regimens.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kenta Iguchi
Manabu Shiozawa
Mamoru Uchiyama
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Yokohama City University
Kanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization
Kanagawa Cancer Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Iguchi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e68219b6db64358760ac6f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05805-3