Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The article examines the historical stages of the development of the constitutional control of the People’s Republic of China, beginning with the Republic of China and the confrontation between the two parties — the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China. In this regard, it provides an overview of the legal status and competence of the Council of Great Judges of the Trial Chamber, as well as a description of the procedure of the body under Taiwan law. Some features of the structure and content of the Chinese constitutions in their dynamics are further revealed. In 2018, the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter — PRC) was amended, including the Preamble, which now proclaims the direction of socialist culture based on the dualism of moral and legal norms, and perfection of the mechanism of application of the Constitution is one of the vectors of development of the Chinese version of the «legal state». So now we can see how China’s legal world is changing. The article concludes that Chinese constitutional control in its modern form does not function effectively due to a number of institutional and cultural reasons.
Victoria Aleksandrovna DYACHKOVA (Thu,) studied this question.