Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objective: There is limited data on the rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in non-intensive care units (ICU). Our aim was to determine the rates and features of CLABSI in non-ICU units. Method: CLABSI surveillance is performed according to CDC criteria in Internal Medicine Nephrology, Pediatric/Adult Hematology, Oncology and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) units. Hospital infections control committee surveillance data was used. Results: Totally, 70028 patient days(pd) and 22358 catheter days, 101 infections were detected in 94 patients. The CLABSI rate was 1.44/1000 pd, the incidence density was 4.2/1000 catheter days, and the device utilization rate was 0.32. The highest infection rate was observed in the adult HSCT unit (15.18/1000 pd). 56.4% of the patients were male (n=53) and the mean age of the patients was 32±2.5 years. The mean length of hospitalization was 27.7±2.5 days. Half of the patients (n=47) had permanent central lines. Hematologic cancer was found in 54.7% and hemodialysis in 19.2%. 21.8% of infections were polymicrobial. Of the 125 microorganisms isolated, 61.6% were Gram negative, 20.8% were fungi and 17.6% were Gram positive. The most frequent pathogen was E.coli (13.6%) followed by and K.pneumoniae (13.6%), Staphylococcus aureus (8%) and C.parapsilosis (7.2%). Crude mortality was 36.2%. Colistin and amikacin were the most effective antibiotics in E.coli and K.pneumoniae, oxacillin resistance was 60% in S. aureus. In Candida species, fluconazole resistance was 15.8%. Conclusion: CLABSI can also be seen outside intensive care units and surveillance in these units is necessary for infection control.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Aslıhan Candevir
Behice Kurtaran
Ferit Kuşçu
Scientific reports in medicine.
Cukurova University
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
Izmir University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Candevir et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e65e3eb6db6435875ecf73 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.37609/srinmed.2
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: