Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Grand ward rounds are an integral component of undergraduate medical education. Covid-19 prevented the conduct of conventional grand ward rounds (CWRs) prompting a 'virtual' grand ward round (VWR). With restrictions lifted should future grand ward rounds remain virtual? Undergraduate perceptions on the two formats were sought to explore the feasibility of the VWR as a teaching ward round for medical students. Methods Our study was done during April 2021 to April 2022. The weekly grand ward round was converted to a VWR during April-November 2021. Following lifting of restrictions, it was reverted to a CWR. All patients provided informed consent. A Zoom-based, secure, online platform was created with the use of smartphones to share audiovisuals and patient discussions. An online anonymised feedback survey was conducted for undergraduates during both VWR and CWR phases. Results The response rate was 71% (182/258). VWR was considered more advantageous than the CWR in terms of time efficiency (p=0.03), space restrictions (p=0.01), improved audibility (p=0.02) and better opportunity to engage in discussions (p=0.1). Most students (80%) felt that the VWR provides a more 'ideal' grand ward. Overall preference was towards VWR across safety (92%), efficacy (72%), communication (85%), information availability (84%) and training opportunity (73%). Again 80% of students preferred future ward rounds to be virtual. Conclusions VWR is an innovative approach. While not a substitute for bedside teaching it appears safer, efficient, thought/discussion-provoking and more satisfactory. Successful elements of the VWR can be adopted in future, to develop a more ideal undergraduate grand ward round.
Gooneratne et al. (Sun,) studied this question.