Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The index of microcirculatory resistance is a reliable measure for evaluating coronary microvasculature, but its prognostic value in patients with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of post–percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR) in patients with NSTEMI. The culprit vessel's angio-IMR was measured after PCI in 2,212 NSTEMI patients at 3 sites. The primary endpoint was 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as a composite of cardiac death, readmission for heart failure, myocardial reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization. The mean post-PCI angio-IMR was 20.63 ± 4.17 in NSTEMI patients. Two hundred six patients were categorized as the high post-PCI angio-IMR group according to maximally selected log-rank statistics. Patients with angio-IMR >25 showed a higher rate of MACEs than those with angio-IMR ≤25 (32.52% vs 9.37%; P 25 was an independent predictor of MACEs (HR: 4.230; 95% CI: 3.151-5.679; P < 0.001) and showed incremental prognostic value compared with conventional risk factors (AUC: 0.774 vs 0.716; P < 0.001; net reclassification index: 0.317; P < 0.001; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.075; P < 0.001). In patients undergoing PCI for NSTEMI, an increased post-PCI angio-IMR is associated with a higher risk of MACEs. The addition of post-PCI angio-IMR into conventional risk factors significantly improves the ability to reclassify patients and estimate the risk of MACEs. (Angiograph-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction; NCT05696379)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yuxuan Zhang
Jun Pu
Tiesheng Niu
КАРДИОЛОГИЯ УЗБЕКИСТАНА
Seoul National University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
China Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5dc44b6db64358757184b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2024.04.048
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: