Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study optimized the anaerobic digestion (AD) of separated collected organic fractions of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) to produce energy and digestate as biofertilizer. Due to OFMSW's partial recalcitrance to degradation, enzymatic (UPP2, MCPS, USC4, USE2, A. niger) and physical (mechanical blending, heating, hydrodynamic cavitation) pre-treatments were tested. Experimental and modeling approaches were used to compare AD performance regarding energy sustainability and digestate quality. Digestate was separated into solid and liquid fractions, and then chemically and physically characterized by investigating the nutrient release mechanisms. Principal Component Analysis was applied, equally weighing energy and digestate productions. Unlike previous studies focusing only on biogas, this study evaluated the effects of pre-treatments on both biogas and digestate production, viewing AD as a biorefinery process for urban waste valorization. Results showed that all pre-treatments were energetically sustainable, but enzymatic pre-treatments yielded digestates richer in nutrients (increase of 80% N, 200% P and 150% K as compared to OFMSW) and with greater organic matter degradation compared to physical pre-treatments. The liquid fraction of digestate from enzymatic pre-treatments had higher nutrient concentrations, while those from physical pre-treatments had more balanced nutrient content, making them more suitable for fertigation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alice Boarino
F. Demichelis
Daniela Vindrola
Waste Management
University of Turin
Polytechnic University of Turin
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Boarino et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5b027b6db643587549e6a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.08.023
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: