Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Changes in wildfire regimes are of growing concern and raise issues about how well we can model risks in a changing climate. Process-based coupled fire-vegetation models, used to project future wildfire regimes, capture many aspects of wildfire regimes poorly. However, there is now a wealth of information from empirical studies on the climate, vegetation, topography and human activity controls on wildfire regimes. The measures used to quantify these controls vary among studies, but certain variables consistently emerge as the most important: gross primary production as a measure of fuel availability, vegetation cover as a measure of fuel continuity, and atmospheric humidity as a measure of fuel drying. Contrary to popular perception, ignitions are generally not a limiting factor for wildfires. In this review, we describe how empirical fire models implement wildfire processes, synthesise current understanding of the controls on wildfire extent and severity, and suggest ways in which fire modelling could be improved.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Olivia Haas
Theodore Keeping
José Gómez‐Dans
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Haas et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e59206b6db64358752d858 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1438262