Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Automated UI evaluation can be beneficial for the design process; for example, to compare different UI designs, or conduct automated heuristic evaluation. LLM-based UI evaluation, in particular, holds the promise of generalizability to a wide variety of UI types and evaluation tasks. However, current LLM-based techniques do not yet match the performance of human evaluators. We hypothesize that automatic evaluation can be improved by collecting a targeted UI feedback dataset and then using this dataset to enhance the performance of general-purpose LLMs. We present a targeted dataset of 3,059 design critiques and quality ratings for 983 mobile UIs, collected from seven designers, each with at least a year of professional design experience. We carried out an in-depth analysis to characterize the dataset’s features. We then applied this dataset to achieve a 55% performance gain in LLM-generated UI feedback via various few-shot and visual prompting techniques. We also discuss future applications of this dataset, including training a reward model for generative UI techniques, and fine-tuning a tool-agnostic multi-modal LLM that automates UI evaluation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peitong Duan
Berkeley College
C. F. Cheng
Google (United States)
Gang Li
Google (United States)
University of California, Berkeley
Google (United States)
Berkeley College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Duan et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c1abc3b45b6e808885a24 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3654777.3676381