Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: ). METHODS: mutations and among all patients and with imlunestrant-abemaciclib as compared with imlunestrant among all patients who had undergone randomization concurrently. RESULTS: mutations, the median progression-free survival was 5.5 months with imlunestrant and 3.8 months with standard therapy. The estimated restricted mean survival time at 19.4 months was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval CI, 6.8 to 9.1) with imlunestrant and 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 6.2) with standard therapy (difference, 2.6 months; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.9; P<0.001). In the overall population, the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months with imlunestrant and 5.5 months with standard therapy (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.04; P = 0.12). Among 426 patients in the comparison of imlunestrant-abemaciclib with imlunestrant, the median progression-free survival was 9.4 months and 5.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.73; P<0.001). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 17.1% with imlunestrant, 20.7% with standard therapy, and 48.6% with imlunestrant-abemaciclib. CONCLUSIONS: -mutation status. (Funded by Eli Lilly; EMBER-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04975308.).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Komal Jhaveri
Brooklyn Hospital Center
Patrick Neven
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
M.L. Casalnuovo
Universidad Abierta Interamericana
New England Journal of Medicine
Cornell University
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jhaveri et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a04fcafc773254194e25bba — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2410858