Abstract Background Waterborne and foodborne diseases (WFDs) represent a relevant public health challenge, especially in countries marked by social and sanitary vulnerabilities, such as Brazil. This study analyzed the spatiotemporal dynamics of WFD outbreaks in the country to support surveillance and control strategies. Methods This population-based ecological study uses data from the Brazilian Ministry of Health on WFD outbreaks reported between 2007 and 2023. Spatial patterns were analyzed via the local empirical Bayesian method, Moran’s I, and local indicators of spatial association (LISA). Spatiotemporal patterns were assessed through emerging hotspot analysis and space-time scan statistics. Seasonality was evaluated via the Kruskal–Wallis test, and temporal trends were analyzed via Prais–Winsten regression. Results A total of 11,809 WFD outbreaks were reported in Brazil, with an average incidence of 34.2 outbreaks per 10 million inhabitants. A heterogeneous and scattered spatial distribution was observed, with high-incidence clusters concentrated in the South Region and a low incidence in the Northeast Region. Fernando de Noronha Island (PE) was the only location identified as part of the most likely spatiotemporal cluster. Seventy municipalities were classified as persistent hotspot areas. Overall, the trend was stationary, with a decrease in outbreaks involving identified pathogens, particularly Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus spp., Bacillus cereus, and Clostridium spp., and an increase in outbreaks caused by norovirus. Conclusions The findings highlight challenges for outbreak surveillance and control, including possible laboratory limitations, underreporting, and the concentration of events in tourist areas, which require coordinated and targeted actions to improve notification and response. Strengthening the active surveillance and training of health teams is essential to mitigate impacts and enhance response capacity. Regional studies that consider environmental, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors, along with analyses of sanitation infrastructure and primary healthcare coverage, can support more effective prevention and control strategies.
Melo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.