Neoclassical Realism (NCR) combines international and domestic factors, offering a multidimensional framework for analyzing foreign policy. While this integration of external and internal dynamics has advanced foreign policy analysis, NCR remains constrained by its reliance on static unit-level variables. This limitation impedes NCR’s potential to fully bridge International Relations (IR) and Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA). In particular, NCR’s treatment of ideational variables as fixed overlooks the dynamic role of elite interactions, which significantly shape a state’s specific and fluid actions toward certain regions or actors—even under stable systemic pressures and enduring strategic-cultural ideas. This article addresses this gap by proposing the inclusion of inter-elite interactions as an intervening variable within the NCR framework. It argues that while the distribution of power sets the parameters for foreign policy, strategic culture and inter-elite interactions shape the specific foreign policy choices. By incorporating a socio-psychological focus on elite relations, the paper aims to enhance NCR’s explanatory power and fully unlock its potential for FPA. This theoretical development offers a more comprehensive framework for analyzing the complexities of foreign policy, advancing a systematic and integrative approach that bridges the divide between agents and structures, and strengthens the theoretical link between IR and FPA.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Haluk Doğan
Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi
Yalova University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Haluk Doğan (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68af540fad7bf08b1eadb188 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1761208
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: