Partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) model specific environments in sequential decision-making under uncertainty. Critically, optimal policies for POMDPs may not be robust against perturbations in the environment. Hidden-model POMDPs (HM-POMDPs) capture sets of different environment models, that is, POMDPs with a shared action and observation space. The intuition is that the true model is hidden among a set of potential models, and it is unknown which model will be the environment at execution time. A policy is robust for a given HM-POMDP if it achieves sufficient performance for each of its POMDPs. We compute such robust policies by combining two orthogonal techniques: (1) a deductive formal verification technique that supports tractable robust policy evaluation by computing a worst-case POMDP within the HM-POMDP, and (2) subgradient ascent to optimize the candidate policy for a worst-case POMDP. The empirical evaluation shows that, compared to various baselines, our approach (1) produces policies that are more robust and generalize better to unseen POMDPs, and (2) scales to HM-POMDPs that consist of over a hundred thousand environments.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Maris F. L. Galesloot
Roman Andriushchenko
Brno University of Technology
Milan Češka
Brno University of Technology
Radboud University Nijmegen
Ruhr University Bochum
Brno University of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Galesloot et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68d469d631b076d99fa67242 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/947