Bitcoin’s extreme price volatility presents significant challenges for investors and traders, necessitating accurate predictive models to guide decision-making in cryptocurrency markets. This study compares the performance of machine learning approaches for Bitcoin price prediction, specifically examining XGBoost gradient boosting, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and GARCH-DL neural networks using comprehensive market data spanning December 2013 to May 2025. We employed extensive feature engineering incorporating technical indicators, applied multiple machine and deep learning models configurations including standalone and ensemble approaches, and utilized cross-validation techniques to assess model robustness. Based on the empirical results, the most significant practical implication is that traders and financial institutions should adopt a dual-model approach, deploying XGBoost for directional trading strategies and utilizing LSTM models for applications requiring precise magnitude predictions, due to their superior continuous forecasting performance. This research demonstrates that traditional technical indicators, particularly market capitalization and price extremes, remain highly predictive in algorithmic trading contexts, validating their continued integration into modern cryptocurrency prediction systems. For risk management applications, the attention-based LSTM’s superior risk-adjusted returns, combined with enhanced interpretability, make it particularly valuable for institutional portfolio optimization and regulatory compliance requirements. The findings suggest that ensemble methods offer balanced performance across multiple evaluation criteria, providing a robust foundation for production trading systems where consistent performance is more valuable than optimization for single metrics. These results enable practitioners to make evidence-based decisions about model selection based on their specific trading objectives, whether focused on directional accuracy for signal generation or precision of magnitude for risk assessment and portfolio management.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mariya Paskaleva
South-West University "Neofit Rilski"
Ivanka Vasenska
South-West University "Neofit Rilski"
Risks
South-West University "Neofit Rilski"
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paskaleva et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5c1ba6950a706b22b5426 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13100195
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: