Abstract Purpose: To evaluate whether cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (CRP) confers benefit beyond contemporary systemic therapy in men with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Methods:Single-center retrospective cohort (2014–2022) comparing CRP plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone. Primary endpoints were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS); secondary endpoints were time to treatment intensification (“no-intensification survival”) and post-intensification progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan–Meier/log-rank and Cox models were used; competing-risk methods estimated subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR) for intensification. Propensity-score matching (1:2; caliper 0.1) tested robustness. Results:Among 164 patients, 58 received CRP and 106 no local therapy; median follow-up was 30.6 months (36.2 among survivors). In the unmatched cohort, 5-year OS was 70.2% with CRP versus 35.4% without (univariable HR 0.24; multivariable HR 0.40; p=0.006), and 5-year CSS was 83.8% versus 49.6% (HR 0.20; pConclusion: CRP integrated with systemic therapy was associated with improved OS/CSS and delayed treatment intensification without affecting outcomes after intensification, supporting CRP as a potential component of multimodal management in selected men; randomized trials are warranted.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yi Hong Li
Yi Lin
Yen‐Chuan Ou
Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Li et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68f17f111f11f0e857c53749 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7696870/v1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: