250 patients with chronic heart disease (CHD) for at least 6 months, aged 18-70 years, admitted to the cardiology clinic of Karaman Training and Research Hospital in Turkey. Median age 62, 71.6% male.
Translation and validation of the Heart Health Self-Efficacy and Self-Management (HH-SESM) scale into Turkish (HH-SESM/T)
Validity (construct, criterion, and content) and reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) of the Turkish version of the HH-SESM scalepatient reported
The Turkish translation of the Heart Health Self-Efficacy and Self-Management scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing self-management and self-efficacy in patients with chronic heart disease.
BACKGROUND: The self-management and self-efficacy skills of people with chronic heart disease affect their health outcomes by determining their lifestyle or health behaviors. It is important to evaluate disease-specific self-efficacy and self-management levels to increase treatment compliance in individuals with chronic heart disease. The aim of the study was to translate the Heart Health Self-Efficacy and Self-Management (HH-SESM) scale into Turkish and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: A total of 250 patients with chronic heart disease were included. The self-efficacy and self-management components of the HH-SESM scale were translated into Turkish (HH-SESM/T) in compliance with international recommendations. The HH-SESM, Self-Care Management Processes-Guarding (SCMP-G), and General Self-Efficacy (GSE) scales were applied to measure the participants' self-management and self-efficacy levels. Construct, criterion, and content validity; internal consistency; and test-retest reliability were analyzed. RESULTS: According to the confirmatory factor analysis, indexes and factor loadings were sufficient. While there was a high positive relationship between the self-management score and the SCMP-G score (ρ = 0.796,p < .001), a moderate positive relationship was observed between the self-efficacy score and the GSE score (ρ = 0.693, p < .001). The content validity index for both components was sufficient. The Cronbach's alpha values for self-efficacy and self-management were 0.79, and 0.81, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients for self-efficacy and self-management were 0.92, and 0.97, respectively. Test and retest scores were similar for the two components. CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of the HH-SESM scale is valid and reliable for the assessment of self-management and self-efficacy in patients with chronic heart disease. The ability of the HH-SESM scale to evaluate both self-efficacy and self-management constructs simultaneously may provide clinicians with a holistic perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov ID: NCT05939297 Registration Date: 21/06/2023.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Emine Tunc Suygun
Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University
Naciye Vardar‐Yağlı
Hacettepe University
Hakan Süygün
Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University
BMC Psychology
Hacettepe University
Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Suygun et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a105b4eb6f5ee040160942d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03539-6