ABSTRACT Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) can screen for a broad range of genetic conditions, potentially enabling early treatment and improving health outcomes. However, it remains outside publicly funded programmes due to limited evidence and substantial implementation challenges. Offering gNBS in the interim as a fee‐for‐service option in Australia risks creating inequitable healthcare access, fragmenting care and limiting control over genomic data. Conversely, prohibiting private access may unfairly deny potential benefits to individual infants and families. This article discusses the ethical and practical implications of offering gNBS on a fee‐for‐service basis prior to a decision being made regarding public funding. Although fee‐for‐service gNBS undermines equitable access, regulated private offerings by public genomics services could mitigate some of the risks. We emphasise the need for large‐scale, well‐designed research studies to inform the development and equitable implementation of robust gNBS programmes within public healthcare frameworks.
Gyngell et al. (Thu,) studied this question.