Abstract In light of the publication of Brook Ziporyn’s monograph, Experiments in Mystical Atheism , the present article attempts a philosophical comparison of two key “mystical atheists”: the Chinese neo-Daoist Guo Xiang 郭象 (252–312) and the early modern Dutch philosopher Benedict de Spinoza (1632–1677). Specifically, it argues that Guo and Spinoza both display a core commitment to radical ontological immanence – the idea that reality is an absolute, self-producing system unaffected by transcendent powers or principles. By drawing out the consequences of this commitment through the interlinked fields of epistemology, ethics and soteriology, it aspires to provide a highly compressed comparative analysis of two culturally and historically remote, yet deeply philosophically resonant, critiques of theistic transcendence. By thus revealing the extent of the structural – and spiritual – parallels between two philosophers, born more than a millennium apart on opposite ends of the Eurasian landmass, it hopes to contribute to the ongoing inductive justification of Ziporyn’s overall hermeneutic project, centered on the speculative identification of a cross-cultural tradition of “mystical atheism”. Such an interpretative undertaking has profound implications for ongoing debates on the character of religion in the modern world.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paul Napier
Topoi
University of Oxford
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paul Napier (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/696c77afeb60fb80d1395e81 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-025-10330-0