Abstract This companion implementation paper operationalizes the QMU/APM multi-proxy impedance gate (Gate A4) as an event-catalog protocol for (i) laboratory plasma circuits and (ii) space-plasma field-aligned current (FAC) events. The test is falsifiable: within a regime bin, does the closure impedance extracted from the port variables (Phi, I) co-vary consistently with two independent proxy routes to the same QMU impedance unit resn, up to regime-level calibration offsets? Ledger anchor and port domain (QMU-only) The protocol is ledger-first and QMU-only. It anchors the analysis on the propagation identity (LedgerOne): Aᵤ\, curl=Fq^2C^2 Port variables are defined by: : = E_\, d\, I: =dQdt The event-level closure impedance is: I=R^\, resn\, R^: =^I^{} Gate A4 (implementation form) Gate A4 compares three dimensionless impedances, each normalized by resn: Z₁^: =/Iresn Z₂^: =chds₄₅₅, ₌₅ₗ₃_₄₅₅resn Z₃^: =indc₄₅₅, ₌₂ₔₑ_₄₅₅resn ₁₂: = Z₁^- Z₂^\, ₁₃: = Z₁^- Z₃^\, ₂₃: = Z₂^- Z₃^ Within each regime bin, Gate A4 passes when these residuals are bounded by a small dispersion after subtracting per-bin offsets (calibration constants), and that dispersion is small relative to cross-regime variation in Z₁^. Robustness prefilters (mandatory) This paper treats Gates A1–A3 as compulsory filters before any A4 claim. A1 (extraction robustness): R^ must be stable under an explicit analysis-setting ensemble S (windowing, filtering, mapping conventions, quadrature variants), quantified by median absolute deviation (MAD). A2 (segmentation stability): when distributed transmission and localized closure intervals are identifiable, Z₃₋^ must be stable (small MAD) or reproducibly multi-modal across event classes. A3 (proxy definability): Z₂^ and Z₃^ must be stable under explicit proxy-variant families Q and R. What this paper delivers This release provides an audit-friendly implementation blueprint that can be applied directly to existing catalogs without SI quantities in analysis or reporting. It specifies a minimal starred event record E= (masd^, B₀^, u^, ^, I^), explicit proxy inference recipes for B, Q, _, L, worked ensemble templates (for example |S|=24 for lab and |S|=36 for space) that make Gates A1–A3 reproducible, a required per-event archival table schema (port tuple, proxy choices, residuals, and gate flags), and diagnostic failure-mode interpretations (F1–F4) that localize why Gate A4 fails when it fails. Recommended use Implementers are encouraged to publish a DOI-archived reproducibility package containing (i) the starred event catalog, (ii) the star-normalization and event-selection specification, (iii) explicit ensembles S, Q, R, and (iv) per-bin residual summaries with fitted offsets. Gate A4 outcomes are designed to be comparable across laboratories and space missions under a common QMU-only reporting standard.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David Thomson
Dynamic Research (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David Thomson (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/696c789ceb60fb80d1396d60 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18273916