ACL-ECG improved AUROC on the PTB-XL dataset by 1.29% to 91.45% and AUPRC by 3.57% to 71.22% compared to the best baseline, demonstrating superior ECG representation learning across multiple datasets.
Does Anatomy-Aware Contrastive Learning for ECG (ACL-ECG) improve the performance of automated ECG analysis compared to standard contrastive baselines?
Unlabeled multi-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) data
Anatomy-Aware Contrastive Learning for ECG (ACL-ECG), a self-supervised deep learning method
State-of-the-art contrastive baselines
Performance on downstream tasks measured by AUROC and AUPRCsurrogate
ACL-ECG provides a self-supervised learning framework that incorporates cardiac anatomical relationships, significantly reducing the need for labeled ECG data while maintaining high diagnostic performance.
Effect estimate: AUROC improvement of 0.95% over strongest baseline LCD on CPSC2018
Absolute Event Rate: 93.94% vs 92.99%
p-value: p=<0.05 for improvements >1% based on DeLong's test
Deep learning has achieved impressive progress in automated electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis, yet its performance still relies heavily on large-scale labeled datasets. As ECG annotation requires cardiologists, this process is costly and time-consuming, limiting its scalability in clinical practice. Contrastive learning offers a promising alternative by enabling the extraction of generalizable representations from unlabeled ECG data. In this study, we propose Anatomy-Aware Contrastive Learning for ECG (ACL-ECG), a self-supervised method that incorporates cardiac anatomical relationships into contrastive learning. ACL-ECG employs a physiology-aware augmentation strategy to generate rhythm-preserving augmented views, including random scale cropping, cardiac-cycle masking, and temporal shifting. Furthermore, ECG leads are grouped into four anatomically meaningful regions—anterior, inferior, septal, and lateral—and region-level contrastive objectives are introduced to promote intra-region consistency while enhancing inter-region discriminability. Extensive evaluations of downstream tasks demonstrate that ACL-ECG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art contrastive baselines under linear probing, achieving improvements of up to 1.29% in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and 3.57% in the area under the precision–recall curve (AUPRC). Moreover, when fine-tuned using only 10% of labeled data, ACL-ECG attains a performance comparable to fully supervised training, effectively reducing annotation requirements by approximately 5∼8×. Ablation studies further confirm the contributions of both the physiology-aware augmentation strategy and the anatomy-aware contrastive objective. Overall, ACL-ECG enhances representation quality without increasing annotation burden, and provides a promising and anatomy-informed foundation for self-supervised ECG analysis in label-scarce settings.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wenhan Liu
East China Jiaotong University
Zhijing Wu
East China Jiaotong University
Fuzhi Zhang
Harbin Engineering University
Sensors
East China Jiaotong University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liu et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Patients with 12-lead ECG recordings from diverse clinical scenarios and multiple institutions including subjects aged 51–80 with predominantly cardiac rhythm abnormalities, encompassing nine cardiac rhythm disorders and five cardiovascular diagnostic categories. ACL-ECG (Anatomy-Aware Contrastive Learning for ECG) self-supervised pretraining with Physio-AUG augmentation strategy vs. State-of-the-art contrastive learning baseline methods including SimCLR, MoCo, BYOL, SimSiam, Barlow Twins, VICReg, Dense Lead Contrast (DLC), Direct Lead Assignment (DLA), and Lead Correlation and Decorrelation (LCD) was evaluated on Electrocardiogram classification performance measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) on downstream datasets (CPSC2018, PTB-XL, Chapman) (AUROC improvement of 0.95% over strongest baseline LCD on CPSC2018, p=<0.05 for improvements >1% based on DeLong's test). ACL-ECG improved AUROC on the PTB-XL dataset by 1.29% to 91.45% and AUPRC by 3.57% to 71.22% compared to the best baseline, demonstrating superior ECG representation learning across multiple datasets.
synapsesocial.com/papers/698979b9f0ec2af6756e7a2b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s26031080