437 Background: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab is a standard first-line therapy for intermediate and poor-risk patients with metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). However, data guiding the optimal second-line treatment after progression on this regimen remain limited. In this study real-world outcomes following second line treatment in this setting were analyzed. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of second line therapies in 356 real-world patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who experienced disease progression on first-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab across 17 tertiary centers in Germany and Switzerland. Results: Median age was 64 years, most patients were male (69.1 %) and had a clear cell histology (74.1 %). ECOG PS was ≥ 2 in 14.3 %. IMDC risk was intermediate in 61.8 % and poor in 28.7 %. Cabozantinib was most frequently administered as subsequent therapy and showed superior median OS and PFS compared to other second-line options. Median OS was 38 months (95 %CI 20.7-55.3) and median PFS 15 months (95 %CI 8.2-21.9) with cabozantinib in second-line setting compared to a median OS of 16 months (95 %CI 10.1-21.9, p = 0.003 ) and median PFS of 7 months (95 %CI 5.1-8.9, p = 0.013 ) in the heterogeneous comparison group including sunitinib (11.3 %), axitinib, pazopanib (both 4.3 %), lenvatinib plus everolimus (3.2 %), tivozanib (2.2 %) and different IO/TKI combinations or study medication (e.g. belzutifan). Comparison of time-to-event data between the two groups revealed a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 0.515 (95% CI, 0.328–0.807; p = 0.004 ) and for disease progression of 0.608 (95% CI, 0.406–0.912; p = 0.016 ) in favor of cabozantinib. Conclusions: Our real-world data support the use of cabozantinib after disease progression on ipilimumab and nivolumab as first-line therapy of aRCC with robust efficacy. Updated results on response rate, survival data and safety will be available for ASCO GU 2026.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hendrik Dinkel
Ramona Stelmach
Stefanie Zschaebitz
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Heidelberg University
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Goethe University Frankfurt
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dinkel et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cc8ed48f933b5eed827d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.437