Against the backdrop of digital technology deeply integrating into the education sector, calligraphy education, as a core carrier for inheriting China's fine traditional culture, is facing a profound game between technological instrumental rationality and cultural value rationality. This conflict profoundly affects the effectiveness of traditional culture in rooting moral education and infiltrating aesthetic education for students. This study focuses on the cultural cognitive conflicts emerging in the digital transformation of calligraphy education, and constructs an integrated analytical framework based on the "Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)" and "Cultural Adaptation Theory". Through mixed research methods, it analyzes four major conflicts in the digital transformation of calligraphy education: the rupture between technological tools and cultural carriers, the collision between educational concepts and technological logic, the fault between cultural identity and technological acceptance, and the gap in urban-rural education resource allocation. Among them, cultural adaptability perception is the key variable regulating technology acceptance and cultural identity. Based on this, this study proposes a four-dimensional adaptation strategy: the construction of a "culture-enhanced" digital ecosystem, the reconstruction of a "technology-culture" dual-helix training system, the cultivation of calligraphy cultural consciousness in the technological era, and the establishment of a governance system of "ensuring fundamentals, promoting balance, and strengthening innovation". This strategy provides a theoretical path and practical scheme for resolving the binary opposition between "technological alienation" and "cultural conservatism" in the digital transformation of calligraphy education, enabling calligraphy education to give full play to its core role of rooting moral spirit and infiltrating the soul with aesthetic education in the digital age, and providing theoretical support and practical paradigms for cultivating new-era talents with cultural subjectivity.
Yiling Chen2 Pei Liu1* (Sun,) studied this question.