The Wiggly Curve of Agile Change is a practitioner framework extending the author’s J-Curve of Change (Viney, 2005) into the context of iterative and agile technology delivery. It proposes that agile sprint cadence does not eliminate the performance disruption described by the J-Curve — it distributes it. Rather than a single large performance dip, organisations undergoing agile transformation experience a series of smaller oscillations repeated at sprint cadence, producing cumulative cognitive load that is difficult to observe in aggregate. Without deliberate change management, this cumulative effect produces a measurable gap between the end state actually achieved and the desired state: what the author terms the ‘dead loss of poor adoption’. The framework challenges the prevalent assumption that agile methods render structured change management unnecessary, drawing on Kahneman’s dual-process theory and the Zeigarnik effect to explain why many small changes may impose a greater total cognitive burden on affected individuals than a single large one. The paper argues that agile does not make change management redundant — it makes it differently necessary: persistent rather than episodic, embedded rather than separate, and focused on minimising the residual cognitive load of continuous iteration rather than managing a single transformational dip.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David Viney
Alchemy (Canada)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David Viney (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e866f16e0dea528ddeb3f3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19665920