Background: Sjögren’s disease (SjD) is a chronic autoimmune rheumatic disorder primarily affecting exocrine glands, leading to dryness and systemic involvement. B-cell hyperactivity and autoantibody production drive its pathogenesis and contribute to increased lymphoma risk. Although several long-term studies exist, we present a review of a closely monitored cohort assessed over 40 years. Methods: Retrospective observational study at University College London Hospital included patients fulfilling the 2016 ACR/EULAR criteria for SjD between 1986–2025. Patients with associated SjD were excluded. Associations between serological markers and clinical features were analysed using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests (p < 0.05). Differences between ethnic groups were also assessed. Results: 283 patients were included, 93.3% female, with mean age at diagnosis of 50.1 ± 15.2 years and mean follow-up of 12.5 ± 8.6 years. Common manifestations were fatigue (61.5%), parotid swelling (30.5%), arthritis (25.8%), and Raynaud’s phenomenon (27.6%). Anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies were present in 75.7% and 45.2%, respectively; rheumatoid factor in 57.3%. Lymphoma developed in 9.9% (mostly non-Hodgkin MALT) and was associated with hypergammaglobulinemia (p = 0.03; RR = 2.56) and parotid swelling (p < 0.001; RR = 5.53). Serological markers correlated with systemic features including lymphadenopathy, vasculitis, and pulmonary involvement. Caucasian patients showed higher mortality (p < 0.001; RR = 3.89) and peripheral nervous system involvement (p = 0.02; RR = 2.18), and less ANA positivity (p = 0.004; RR = 0.88), anti-Ro (p = <0.001; RR = 0.77) and RF (p = 0.04; RR = 0.81) and hypergammaglobulinemia (p = <0.001; RR = 0.63) when compared with non-Caucasian patients. Conclusions: This long-term cohort confirms the strong association between B-cell activation markers and adverse outcomes in Sjögren’s disease. Hypergammaglobulinemia and parotid swelling emerged as key predictors of lymphoma, supporting their role in risk stratification. These findings reinforce the importance of long-term monitoring and may help guide personalized clinical management and surveillance strategies.
Viejo-Sosa et al. (Mon,) studied this question.