What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to understand how icon labels and styles influence user judgment and download intentions across different cultures. It highlights the importance of cultural differences in interface design.

May 13, 2026

Complementary or redundant? How icon labels and style shape user judgment across cultures and contexts

Key Points

This research aims to understand how icon labels and styles influence user judgment and download intentions across different cultures. It highlights the importance of cultural differences in interface design.
Three between-subjects experiments conducted in China and Korea with N = 291, 389, and 836 respectively.
Experiment 1 tested the effects of icon labels and styles on semantic fit and download intentions.
Experiment 2 introduced culture as a moderator using parallel experimental procedures in both countries.
Experiment 3 incorporated app type to examine contextual influences.
Data were analyzed using MANCOVA and PROCESS-based moderated mediation analyses.
Icon labels enhance perceived semantic fit but do not always increase download intention, indicating a trade-off.
Text-based icons improve semantic interpretation, while graphic-based icons increase download intention due to affective appeal.
Cultural differences reveal that Chinese users prefer labeled, semantically explicit designs, while Koreans favor visually minimal designs.
Utilitarian apps benefit from label-text combinations, while hedonic apps perform better with graphic styles.

Abstract

Purpose In the context of an increasingly competitive mobile app marketplace, app icons function not only as visual signifiers but also as important carriers of functional semantics. From a visual-semantic integration perspective, this research investigates how icon labels (present vs. absent) and icon styles (text-based vs. graphic-based) affect users' perceived semantic fit and download intention, and examines the moderating roles of cultural differences and app type. Design/methodology/approach Three between-subjects experiments (N = 291, 389, 836) were conducted. Study 1 employed a 2 (label) × 2 (style) design to test the core effects and a moderated mediation model with semantic fit as the mediator. Study 2 extended the model by introducing culture as a moderator using parallel experimental procedures in China and Korea. Study 3 incorporated application type as a contextual boundary condition. Data were analyzed using MANCOVA and PROCESS-based moderated mediation analyses. Findings Across studies, icon labels consistently enhanced perceived semantic fit but did not uniformly increase download intention, revealing a trade-off between semantic clarity and visual fluency. Text-based icons strengthened semantic interpretation, whereas graphic-based icons elicited higher download intention through affective appeal. Semantic fit mediated the effect of labels on download intention, with this mediation being stronger for text-based icons. Moreover, cultural and app type significantly shape these mechanisms, Chinese users show a stronger preference for labeled, semantically explicit designs, whereas Korean users favor label-free, visually minimal designs; utilitarian apps are better served by label–text combinations, while hedonic apps benefit more from graphic treatments. Originality/value These findings refine theories of visual-semantic congruency by revealing how cultural cognition and task fit moderate interface-design effects, and provide empirical guidance for cross-cultural app icon design and market localization.

Bookmark

Cite This Study

Bai et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03cbe01c527af8f1ecf9c1 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-01-2026-0039

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Bookmark