Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDIs) are approved for treating hematologic cancers and are currently being evaluated in hundreds of clinical trials for various cancers and other diseases, although their mechanisms of action remain poorly understood. Here, our unbiased bioinformatics analyses found that, for most cancer types, expression levels or genetic variants of histone deacetylase (HDACs) do not consistently correlate with carcinogenesis, do not predict cancer patient survival, and do not associate with cellular responses to HDIs. Whole-genome CRISPR library screens did not identify HDACs as genes affecting cellular responses to HDIs. Overexpression of dominant-negative Class I HDACs causes similar protein hyperacetylation as Class I-specific HDI FK228, but does not have similar cytotoxic or transcriptomic effects as FK228 in vitro, and does not alter the anticancer effects of FK228 in vivo in a liver cancer mouse model. Chemical manipulations of a pan-HDI SAHA can abolish its HDAC-inhibiting activity without altering its anticancer effects in vivo in an allograft colon cancer mouse model. These results suggest that HDAC enzyme activity is not necessarily the de facto target of HDIs for their anticancer effects. This finding encourages a shift away from a narrow focus on HDACs for understanding HDIs' pharmacodynamics, opening new avenues for developing next-generation compounds for cancers and beyond.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rai et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a265b7cad53cfb9357c5163 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-026-02698-1
Chaitra Rai
Baylor College of Medicine
Hang Ruan
Soochow University
Xue Li (285380)
Army Medical University
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Baylor College of Medicine
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: