GLP-1RA and SGLT2i were associated with a lower risk of modified MACE, HHF, all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and stroke compared with DPP4i.
Cohort
Yes
Do SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in adults with T2D at low-to-moderate CV risk?
Adults with type 2 diabetes at low-to-moderate cardiovascular risk, followed for a mean of ~12 months.
SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists
DPP-4 inhibitors (and head-to-head SGLT2i vs GLP-1RA)
Modified MACE (all-cause mortality, stroke, MI), MACE (CV mortality, stroke, MI), and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF)composite
In adults with T2D at low-to-moderate cardiovascular risk, SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists are more effective than DPP-4 inhibitors in preventing adverse cardiovascular outcomes, though SGLT2 inhibitors carry specific safety risks.
Introduction and Objective: The comparative effectiveness and safety of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA in adults with T2D at low-to-moderate CV risk, who constitute most of this population, remain inadequately characterized. We conducted head-to-head comparisons versus DPP4i to inform treatment selection in routine clinical practice. Methods: Using four databases from 2013-2021 (UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink; US Medicare and two commercial claims databases), we conducted three active-comparator cohort comparisons of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, and DPP4i. Primary outcomes were modified MACE (all-cause mortality, stroke, MI), MACE (CV mortality, stroke, MI), and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), with additional effectiveness and safety outcomes evaluated (Table). Propensity score fine-stratification weighting was used to adjust for confounding. HRs with 95% CIs were estimated. Results: Over a mean follow-up of ~12 months, both GLP-1RA and SGLT2i were associated with a lower risk of modified MACE, HHF, all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and stroke compared with DPP4i. Compared with GLP-1RA, SGLT2i showed a lower risk of HHF, but higher risks of DKA and genital infections than both GLP-1RA and DPP4i, and a higher risk of lower-limb amputations (Table). Conclusion: Among adults with T2D at low-to-moderate CV risk, GLP-1RA and SGLT2i were more effective than DPP4i in preventing adverse CV outcomes. We confirmed safety signals for SGLT2i. Disclosure H. Cho: None. W. Alkabbani: None. J. Ortega-Montiel: None. H. Yin: None. S. Cromer: Other - Spouse is employee of Depuy Synthes; Current; Johnson Current; Novo Nordisk. Consultant; Ended; Kowa Company, Ltd., Merck Ended; Novo Nordisk. Other - Royalties; Current; UpToDate. Other - Associate Editor; Current; Circulation. J. Paik: None. D. Wexler: Other - Data Monitoring Committee; Ended; Novo Nordisk. Other - Data Monitoring Committee; Current; Amgen Inc. L.R. Azoulay: Consultant; Current; Roche Diagnostics. Consultant; Ended; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. E. Patorno: Research Support; Current; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Other - Royalties; Current; UpToDate. Funding Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (DB-2020C2-20326)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
HANSEUL CHO
Emmanuel Bible College
Wajd Alkabbani
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Janinne Ortega-Montiel
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Diabetes
Emmanuel Bible College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
CHO et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Type 2 Diabetes at low-to-moderate cardiovascular risk. SGLT2i and GLP-1RA vs. DPP4i was evaluated on Modified MACE (all-cause mortality, stroke, MI), MACE (CV mortality, stroke, MI), and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). GLP-1RA and SGLT2i were associated with a lower risk of modified MACE, HHF, all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and stroke compared with DPP4i.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250cbc7def13d035e1cf15 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/db26-2201-p