Depending on the perspective, Emma Tennant’s tess (1993) can be interpreted as a neo-Victorian, postmodernist, and revisionist novel. This paper is aimed at analyzing tess from the aspect of revisionism. By offering a familiar story from a female perspective and combining it with an imaginative biography of Hardy’s life and a polemic account of the history of women’s oppression, the narrator intends to challenge the well-known past and rewrite it. The Victorian era is represented as “the last great age of punishment for women”, but such representation is extended to Thomas Hardy. By presenting unknown facts that portray the writer in a negative context, the narrator intends to “shake” our understanding of the allegedly well-known past and break into history. The novel implies that the Victorian age was even bleaker than it is usually thought of, but this vision is extended to the present, which is arguably represented in an even grimmer light. By pointing to the patterns visible both in the past and the present, the narrator’s purpose is to highlight the timeless, universal topics that permeate all the literary and historical periods, such as the oppression of women. As suggested by the novel, the only way to end the tradition of women’s subordination and punishment is to allow women to tell their own stories.
Nataša V. Ninčetović (Thu,) studied this question.