Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract. The increasing demand for 3D digital models has spurred the rapid evolution of technologies to acquire, process, and disseminate 3D data of physical artifacts. Current scanners meet building surveying needs, prompting the exploration of closed systems with multiple sensors, custom accessories, control systems, and varied data processing approaches. While efficient in specific conditions, these systems require careful consideration of factors like technical requirements, environmental conditions, and the intended use of the final model. This article compares a static terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) and a portable mobile mapping system (PMMS) for documenting built heritage, focusing on the City Hall of Montecatini Terme in Italy. The Leica Geosystems RTC360 scanner provides quick scanning times and pre-alignment during fieldwork, reducing post-processing efforts. The Leica BLK2GO, belonging to the PMMS family, utilizes laser SLAM, visual SLAM, and inertial IMU measurements for rapid large-area documentation. The comparison assesses accuracy, completeness, and detail recognition, revealing that both systems are suitable for heritage documentation requiring centimetre-level accuracy. However, differences in point density and roughness indicate that the RTC360 may be better for intricate details. The BLK2GO excels in efficiency but is more oriented toward general representations at the architectural scale. This study emphasizes the importance of evaluating different methodologies based on project objectives and desired levels of detail, providing insights into the strengths and limitations of each system for diverse applications in heritage documentation.
Conti et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: