This article critiques penal philosophy and practice in contemporary society through the lens of historical–ecclesial tradition. The article opens with a discussion of the penitential rituals in the first Christian monasteries and the eventual adoption of some of these rituals in the earliest state penitentiaries in the U.S. It is argued that a nonviolent and coherent penal ideology was advocated from the inception of Christian monasticism and subsequently maintained over the centuries due to three paradigmatic values and commitments. These values and commitments, which form the basis of the critique, are a theological metanarrative, a moral ontology, and a belief in sin as an existential fact. These tenets are used to interrogate the traditional justifications of punishment that have guided government policy throughout modern history, in the U.S. and abroad.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Andrew Skotnicki
Manhattan College
Karol Lucken
University of Central Florida
Histories
University of Central Florida
Manhattan College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Skotnicki et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68f199bfde32064e504dca67 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/histories5040052
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: