PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 6, 2026Materials0 citationsOpen Access

Machine Learning-Assisted Optimisation of the Laser Beam Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB) Process Parameters of H13 Tool Steel Fabricated on a Preheated to 350 ∘C Building Platform

View Full Paper
KKKatsiaryna KosaravaPWPaweł WidomskiMZMichał Ziętala

Key Points

  • To optimize the Laser Beam Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB) process parameters for H13 tool steel using machine learning.
  • Applied machine learning models to optimize PBF-LB parameters.
  • Produced 189 cylindrical specimens for training and testing.
  • Investigated eight different machine learning models for prediction.
  • Achieved relative densities over 99.6% of theoretical value.
  • XGBoost model showed the highest predictive accuracy (R2=0.977).
  • LightGBM-predicted parameters resulted in hardness of 630 HV0.5 after tempering.

Abstract

This study presents the first application of Machine Learning (ML) models to optimise Powder Bed Fusion using Laser Beam (PBF-LB) process parameters for H13 steel fabricated on a 350 °C preheated building platform. A total of 189 cylindrical specimens were produced for training and testing machine learning (ML) models using variable process parameters: laser power (250–350 W), scanning speed (1050–1300 mm/s), and hatch spacing (65–90 μm). Eight ML models were investigated: 1. Support Vector Regression (SVR), 2. Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR), 3. Stochastic Gradient Descent Regressor, 4. Random Forest Regressor (RFR), 5. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), 6. Extreme Gradient Boosting with limited depth (XGBoost LD), 7. Extra Trees Regressor (ETR) and 8. Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). All models were trained using the Fast Library for Automated Machine Learning & Tuning (FLAML) framework to predict the relative density of the fabricated samples. Among these, the XGBoost model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with a coefficient of determination R2=0.977, mean absolute percentage error MAPE = 0.002, and mean absolute error MAE = 0.017. Experimental validation was conducted on 27 newly fabricated samples using ML predicted process parameters. Relative densities exceeding 99.6% of the theoretical value (7.76 g/cm3) for all models except XGBoost LD and KRR. The lowest MAE = 0.004 and the smallest difference between the ML-predicted and PBF-LB validated density were obtained for samples made with LightGBM-predicted parameters. Those samples exhibited a hardness of 604 ± 13 HV0.5, which increased to approximately 630 HV0.5 after tempering at 550 °C. The LightGBM optimised parameters were further applied to fabricate a part of a forging die incorporating internal through-cooling channels, demonstrating the efficacy of machine learning-guided optimisation in achieving dense, defect-free H13 components suitable for industrial applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kosarava et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695d8e503483e917927a5458https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19010210
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper