PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2026Open Forum Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

P-51. Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

View Full Paper
OCOsvaldo D Cabrera-CastellanosGCGabriel Cedeño-SánchezFGFrancisco Guzman-Ricardo

Key Points

  • This research aims to characterize the patterns and factors associated with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia.
  • Retrospective case-control study involving 79 patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia
  • Comparison of 15 CRPA and 64 carbapenem-susceptible isolates
  • Analysis of electronic medical records for demographics, risk factors, and outcomes
  • Calculation of Odds Ratio (OR) and p-value to assess significance
  • Mortality rate was higher in CRPA patients at 46.7% compared to 37.5% in CSPA
  • Resistance to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam was found in 38.5% of CRPA isolates
  • 100% susceptibility observed in ceftazidime-avibactam evaluated isolates
  • Prolonged length of stay identified as a risk factor for CRPA infection

Abstract

Abstract Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is an opportunistic pathogen linked to bacteremia and infections in healthcare settings. Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) is classified as a high priority pathogen on the World Health Organization´s (WHO) priority list. Therefore, this study aims to characterize the microbiological and clinical patterns, risk factors and clinical manifestations of P. aeruginosa bacteremia in a hospital setting in the Dominican Republic.Graphic 1:Resistance pattern in CRPA isolates (n = 15)Graphic 2:Antimicrobial resistance of CRPA isolates (n = 15) Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted in 79 patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia (15 CRPA and 64 Carbapenem-susceptible) from March 2021 to November 2024. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographics, co-morbidities, risk factors, resistance patterns, and outcomes. An analysis was performed to calculate Odds Ratio (OR) and p-value ≤ 0.05.Table 1:Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance Between CRPA and CSPA IsolatesGraphic 3:Antibiotic resistance in CRPA vs. CSPA isolates (%). Results Carbapenemase production was negative (7/15), indeterminate (6/15) or positive (1/15 KPC and 1/15 IMP). Mortality in CRPA patients was at 46.7% (7/15) vs 37.5% (24/64) in CSPA. Regarding susceptibility patterns, resistance to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam was 38.5% (5/13; 2 missing values). In relation to ceftazidime-avibactam, 100% of isolates evaluated for resistance were susceptible (13/13; 2 missing values). Length of stay (LOS) of ≥15 days was identified as a potential risk factor for CRPA infection when compared to CSPA (p = 0.004). Notably, patients with CRPA infections exhibited a prolonged LOS. Conclusion CRPA bloodstream infections are associated with high mortality, frequently attributed to carbapenemase production, carbapenemase identification remained indetermined in a significant proportion of isolates (40%) due to phenotypic testing limitations. Improved carbapenemase detection and enhanced antimicrobial stewardship and infection control are crucial to combat the high mortality and economic costs of CRPA bloodstream infections, especially in prolonged-stay ICU patients. Disclosures Rita A. Rojas-Fermín, MD, GSK: Honoraria

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cabrera-Castellanos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6966e72413bf7a6f02bff800https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.280
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper