PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Instructional Science2 citationsOpen Access

Situating collaborative disciplinary activity: creating a space for high-quality group engagement

View Full Paper
TRToni Kempler RogatATAnne TraynorCHCindy E. Hmelo-Silve

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the dimensions and dynamics of group disciplinary engagement.
  • Analyzed 2.5-minute video segments from middle school science and mathematics curricula.
  • Rated quality in five dimensions of group disciplinary engagement.
  • Employed dynamic structural equation modeling to analyze interrelationships and moderators.
  • Found positive interrelations among all engagement dimensions except socioemotional engagement.
  • Disciplinary engagement was a positive predictor of collaborative and behavioral engagement.
  • Higher disciplinary engagement was associated with open tasks, while simulations fostered metacognitive engagement.

Abstract

This research investigates interrelated dimensions, dynamics, and context influences of group disciplinary engagement (GDE). Quality ratings were assigned for five GDE dimensions to 2.5-minute segments, from video drawn from three different middle school science and mathematics curriculum contexts. Dynamic structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the interrelationships and changes in group engagement quality and the role of contextual moderators. Results indicated positive interrelations among all engagement dimensions, save socioemotional engagement, suggesting a mutually supportive relationship. Temporally, disciplinary engagement (DE) had a key role as a positive predictor of collaborative, disciplinary, and behavioral engagement. Open tasks were associated with higher DE, while simulations fostered metacognitive engagement. This study has implications for understanding the complexity of GDE patterns as contextually situated.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rogat et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69800910aa6434d8c2036e46https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09772-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper