PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 13, 2016JAMA3,098 citationsOpen Access

Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses

GSGillian D SandersPNPeter J. NeumannABAnirban Basu

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance the quality and transparency of cost-effectiveness analyses in the healthcare field.
  • The Second Panel conducted a comprehensive review of current methodological practices in cost-effectiveness analysis.
  • Recommendations include performing analyses from two distinct reference case perspectives and documenting an impact inventory.
  • The introduction of the new recommendations aims to improve clarity in the reported consequences of analyses.
  • Changes are expected to promote more rigorous and standardized approaches in cost-effectiveness reporting.

Abstract

The Second Panel reviewed the current status of the field of cost-effectiveness analysis and developed a new set of recommendations. Major changes include the recommendation to perform analyses from 2 reference case perspectives and to provide an impact inventory to clarify included consequences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sanders et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698638553b00292770426f6bhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12195
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper