PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Complexities1 citationsOpen Access

From Statistical Mechanics to Nonlinear Dynamics and into Complex Systems

ARA. Robledo

Key Points

  • The aim is to shift from empirical studies of complex systems to predictive models using nonlinear dynamics.
  • Utilizes the Landau-Ginzburg equation for dissipative processes.
  • Imposes discrete time evolution with a power-law driving force.
  • Develops a nonlinear renormalization-group fixed-point map for transitions to chaos.
  • Analyzes Lyapunov function as the thermodynamic potential in q-statistics.
  • Derives a fixed-point map that describes three one-dimensional transitions to chaos.
  • Establishes connections to empirical laws such as Zipf law and Kleiber law.
  • Explains complexities in multiple domains including biology and physics.

Abstract

We detail a procedure to transform the current empirical stage in the study of complex systems into a predictive phenomenological one. Our approach starts with the statistical-mechanical Landau-Ginzburg equation for dissipative processes, such as kinetics of phase change. Then, it imposes discrete time evolution to explicit back feeding, and adopts a power-law driving force to incorporate the onset of chaos, or, alternatively, criticality, the guiding principles of complexity. One obtains, in closed analytical form, a nonlinear renormalization-group (RG) fixed-point map descriptive of any of the three known (one-dimensional) transitions to or out of chaos. Furthermore, its Lyapunov function is shown to be the thermodynamic potential in q-statistics, because the regular or multifractal attractors at the transitions to chaos impose a severe impediment to access the system’s built-in configurations, leaving only a subset of vanishing measure available. To test the pertinence of our approach, we refer to the following complex systems issues: (i) Basic questions, such as demonstration of paradigms equivalence, illustration of self-organization, thermodynamic viewpoint of diversity, biological or other. (ii) Derivation of empirical laws, e.g., ranked data distributions (Zipf law), biological regularities (Kleiber law), river and cosmological structures (Hack law). (iii) Complex systems methods, for example, evolutionary game theory, self-similar networks, central-limit theorem questions. (iv) Condensed-matter physics complex problems (and their analogs in other disciplines), like, critical fluctuations (catastrophes), glass formation (traffic jams), localization transition (foraging, collective motion).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A. Robledo (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b4139b75e639e9b08e83https://doi.org/10.3390/complexities2010003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Statistical Physics Out of Equilibrium: Quantitative Results and Universality2025
  2. 2Topological Statistical Physics: From Finite Topological Histories and Causal Many-Body Dynamics to Equilibrium, Irreversibility, Criticality, Quantum Statistics, and Continuum Transport2026
  3. 3Thermodynamics of chaotic relaxation processes2024
  4. 4Non-equilibrium Statistical Mechanics in Biological Systems2024
  5. 5Thermodynamics of chaotic relaxation processes2024 · 2 citations