The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of detecting crop damage caused by wild boar in rapeseed fields using UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle)-derived RGB (red, green and blue) imagery and deep learning segmentation models. The experiments were conducted on rapeseed crops at full maturity shortly before harvest in central-western Poland in 2021. Four convolutional neural network architectures—U-Net (U-shaped network), U-Net++, DeepLabV3+ (deep learning + labelling), and PSPNet (Pyramid Scene Parsing Network)—were benchmarked using two input configurations: RGB imagery alone and RGB combined with the topographic position index (TPI) derived from a digital surface model (DSM). Model performance was assessed using overall accuracy, F1-score (harmonic mean of precision and recall), and Intersection over Union (IoU), with class-specific metrics reported to provide a realistic evaluation of damaged-area detection. For RGB-only data, overall accuracy ranged from 0.957 to 0.972, while damaged-class F1 and IoU reached 0.752 and 0.603, respectively, for the best-performing model (U-Net). When RGB data were supplemented with TPI, overall accuracy and damaged-class metrics changed only slightly, indicating limited benefit from the topographic feature under these field conditions. Non-damaged crop areas were consistently well-classified (F1 > 0.977, IoU > 0.955). These results confirm that UAV-based RGB imagery enables reliable late-season assessment of wildlife-induced crop damage, and that reporting class-specific metrics in spatially independent test sets is essential for realistic performance evaluation.
Dobosz et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: