Evaluates deep learning models for detecting crop damage in rapeseed, suggesting reliable UAV assessments for wildlife effects.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of detecting crop damage caused by wild boar in rapeseed fields using UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle)-derived RGB (red, green and blue) imagery and deep learning segmentation models. The experiments were conducted on rapeseed crops at full maturity shortly before harvest in central-western Poland in 2021. Four convolutional neural network architectures—U-Net (U-shaped network), U-Net++, DeepLabV3+ (deep learning + labelling), and PSPNet (Pyramid Scene Parsing Network)—were benchmarked using two input configurations: RGB imagery alone and RGB combined with the topographic position index (TPI) derived from a digital surface model (DSM). Model performance was assessed using overall accuracy, F1-score (harmonic mean of precision and recall), and Intersection over Union (IoU), with class-specific metrics reported to provide a realistic evaluation of damaged-area detection. For RGB-only data, overall accuracy ranged from 0.957 to 0.972, while damaged-class F1 and IoU reached 0.752 and 0.603, respectively, for the best-performing model (U-Net). When RGB data were supplemented with TPI, overall accuracy and damaged-class metrics changed only slightly, indicating limited benefit from the topographic feature under these field conditions. Non-damaged crop areas were consistently well-classified (F1 > 0.977, IoU > 0.955). These results confirm that UAV-based RGB imagery enables reliable late-season assessment of wildlife-induced crop damage, and that reporting class-specific metrics in spatially independent test sets is essential for realistic performance evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dobosz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: