PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Smart Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Quasi-Static, Rolling and Shear Behaviors of an Auxetic Non-Pneumatic Tire with TPMS-Based Spokes

View Full Paper
HKHong-Seok KimPusan National UniversityDKDo‐Yeon KimPusan National UniversitySPS H ParkPusan National University

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the rolling and shear behaviors of a non-pneumatic tire using an auxetic structure.
  • Conducted quasi-static rolling simulations over 2.7 spoke-pitch cycles.
  • Compared ground reaction force fluctuations and stiffness between auxetic RPAS and conventional honeycomb designs.
  • Analyzed shear response to determine structural integrity of the tire.
  • Position-dependent ground reaction force fluctuations reduced to 0.78% for RPAS compared to 3.32% for honeycomb at 2.5 mm compression.
  • Shear stiffness was found to be 0.61 N/mm for RPAS and 0.58 N/mm for honeycomb, demonstrating comparable stability.
  • Insights gained provide a foundation for future studies on multi-cycle loading and high-speed dynamics.

Abstract

This study investigates the quasi-static rolling behavior and shear response of a non-pneumatic tire incorporating a Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS)-based Rotated Primitive Auxetic Structure (RPAS).The RPAS spoke derives a negative Poisson's ratio from rotational transformations of Primitive TPMS unit cells, enabling load-adaptive variable stiffness through auxetic densification.Building upon validated static results, quasi-static rolling simulations over approximately 2.7 spoke-pitch cycles showed that position-dependent ground reaction force fluctuations were reduced to 0.78% for the RPAS, compared to 3.32% for a conventional honeycomb design at 2.5 mm compression.This reduction is attributed to a self-compensating mechanism where auxetic densification of the RPAS partially bridges the geometric gaps between discrete spokes.Shear analysis yielded a stiffness of 0.61 N/mm for the RPAS, comparable to the honeycomb tire (0.58 N/mm), indicating that the auxetic architecture does not compromise longitudinal stability.These numerical insights provide a foundation for future investigations involving multi-cycle loading and high-speed dynamics to further extend the scalability of the proposed RPAS design.The present findings should be interpreted as structural design tendencies obtained under quasi-static numerical conditions; extension to high-speed operation and full-scale rubber tires requires dedicated experimental and viscoelastic-dynamic validation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edab814a46254e215b3758https://doi.org/10.57062/ijpem-st.2026.00080
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1TPMS-based auxetic structure for high-performance airless tires with variable stiffness depending on deformation2024 · 24 citations
  2. 2TPMS-based auxetic structure for high-performance airless tires with variable stiffness depending on deformation2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Experiment-informed finite element modeling and design optimization of a non-pneumatic tire featuring an auxetic anti-tetrachiral metamaterial2026
  4. 4Comparative Analysis of Non-Pneumatic Tire Spoke Designs for Off-Road Applications: A Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Perspective2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5From Shear to Sound: Mechanics–Acoustics Mapping of TPMS Lattices2026