PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Concise Review of Current Practices, Regulatory Frameworks, and Future Perspectives

View Full Paper
SYSukirti YadavDYDr. Hari Krishna YadavAPAkriti Pal

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the evolution, current practices, and future perspectives of pharmacovigilance in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Review of historical evolution and global regulatory frameworks in pharmacovigilance.
  • Analysis of core industry activities including ADR reporting and risk management.
  • Discussion of the impact of AI and real-world data on current practices.
  • Identification of challenges such as underreporting and global harmonization gaps.
  • Presentation of an ADR classification framework to enhance understanding.
  • Emphasis on the transformative role of patient-centric approaches and digital adaptation.

Abstract

Pharmacovigilance (PV) is the science and regulatory activity devoted to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects of medicines. For pharmaceutical industries, PV constitutes both a statutory obligation and a fundamental public health commitment, operating across the entire product lifecycle from pre-clinical development through post-market surveillance. This concise review examines the historical evolution of pharmacovigilance, its global regulatory architecture, core industry activities including adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting, signal detection, periodic safety reporting, and risk management planning, as well as the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI), real-world data (RWD), and patient-centric approaches on contemporary PV practice. Three structured tables and an ADR classification framework are presented to consolidate essential knowledge. Challenges including underreporting, global harmonization gaps, and digital regulatory adaptation are discussed alongside future perspectives. Thirty peer-reviewed references and authoritative regulatory guidelines underpin the analysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yadav et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f594b171405d493afff8c6https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19916167
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper