PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 23, 2006399 citations

Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools

View Full Paper
BSBen ShneidermanCPCatherine Plaisant

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

After an historical review of evaluation methods, we describe an emerging research method called Multi-dimensional In-depth Long-term Case studies (MILCs) which seems well adapted to study the creative activities that users of information visualization systems engage in. We propose that the efficacy of tools can be assessed by documenting 1) usage (observations, interviews, surveys, logging etc.) and 2) expert users' success in achieving their professional goals. We summarize lessons from related ethnography methods used in HCI and provide guidelines for conducting MILCs for information visualization. We suggest ways to refine the methods for MILCs in modest sized projects and then envision ambitious projects with 3-10 researchers working over 1-3 years to understand individual and organizational use of information visualization by domain experts working at the frontiers of knowledge in their fields.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shneiderman et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0883069a6c4ba6e610ad4fhttps://doi.org/10.1145/1168149.1168158
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper